Truth, that is verifiable facts as opposed to belief, is a vital part
of the cultural narrative and operation of modern humanity. Truth does not require a lot of
defending because it can stand happily on its own two feet. It takes little
effort or money to be spent in affirming it. Truth is not sustained by
propaganda but evidence. There are physical absolutes determined by science, absolute zero temperature springs to mind. You can build on a truth such as this one.
Religious belief however does not enjoy this simple status. Being
of a nebulous and elusive nature it requires a vast apparatus of propaganda and
good will to keep its flimsy body from fading into oblivion. Faith and religious belief do not have the academic respectability that evidence based observations have,
instead their existence depends completely on the cultivation of a primitive
superstition called “holiness”.
What then is holy? Can you
walk through a field and stumble on something that you can tell is obviously
holy? If a thing is holy to you, why not for everyone? How can you determine if a thing is holy? If something is made holy only
by someone else’s opinion; does that make it holy? Is anything holy?
Through centuries of unchallenged assumption, there is a
collective reverence and plenty of good will for religious faith and also for the moral stance of
believers. Most people have acknowledged that faith and holiness have
contributed something positive to the welfare of most societies across the
world. This common focus of venerating holy things has proved to be useful in
persuading the masses to conform within a community. It is on this same ticket by
assumptions of holiness and of unquestioned reverence for the Bible that the
Watchtower religion has gained converts. However you cannot build progressive ideas from
holiness, all you can do with it is enjoy a fuzzy feeling inside and find new
believers to share your emotional experience.
Whenever I hear the Watchtower propaganda, which by the way is
mainly from this site, I am revolted by the endless repetition of cult 'trigger
language’ such as “God’s people”, expressions which tie true-believers into their
exclusive community. These are patronizing words which soothe troubled minds
and hearts and give readers a warm glow from a sense of belonging to a ‘divinely
ordained’ organisation.
Yet there is nothing objective about the language
of the Watchtower, it constantly talks about “truth” but never dares to analyse
the basis for any statement it ever makes other than the superficial given;
that it originates in the Bible, it is "Bible based" and you need a "Bible based conscience" etc, etc. It is like a constant barrage of mental rivets endeavouring to hold a monstrous alien creation in one piece.
The JW organisation never questions the validity of the Bible’s
viewpoint because its income and existence is based squarely on the false
belief that the Bible is a book of prophecy and is incapable of error. Conversely the
Bible has no useful prophecy and is riven through with contradictions and
errors. On this fundamental misconception the whole output of JW rhetoric falls
down.
Humans are suckers for holiness and the Watchtower knows it. Relentless
propaganda is directed at the faithful in an attempt to support its holy lies and false promises.Truth is easy, it is only falsehoods which continually require propaganda
to make them credible.
After leaving the JW world, is it this which now makes reading the Watchtower so nauseating?
